This is topic Friend getting 331 dynoed guess what it makes! in forum Tech Talk at Northern California Ford Owners .
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=004263
Posted by 93mustangt (Member # 680) on
:
My friend is going to be getting his new 331 dynoed wanted to see what you guys thought it would make.
heres his setup
FPS 331 stroker 10.2/1
Canfield heads ported by i think avenger.
BBK 1 5/8 long tubes
BBK shorty h
2 chambers
#30 injectors
adjustable fuel pressure regulator
aluminum driveshaft
t5 with mecloud clutch and billet flywheel with adjustable clutch quadrant
performer rpm intake
E303 regorund .536 intake .536 exhaust not sure the duration but i think its pretty close to the x303
The engine builder said it should make power till about 6500RPM
What kind of power do you think it will make?What kind of times to expect?
Posted by shade-tree (Member # 298) on
:
310 rwhp
Posted by 93PONY (Member # 60) on
:
341/350 RW
Posted by 67stang12s (Member # 2314) on
:
around 330rwhp
Posted by 93mustangt (Member # 680) on
:
Why such low numbers?I thought it would make more than that.
Posted by Black94 5.0 (Member # 655) on
:
330rwhp and 360rwtq...
It depends on the size valve's he has in the heads and how heavy is the porting is....
Posted by 67stang12s (Member # 2314) on
:
how much rwhp did u think?
and is the cam reground to his motor and car?
because to me thats where he is losing it even though the canfields are a nice touch they work best with a blower like set up
just my $0.02
[ May 27, 2003, 11:45 PM: Message edited by: 67stang12s ]
Posted by Black94 5.0 (Member # 655) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by 93mustangt:
Why such low numbers?I thought it would make more than that.
You didnt say if it was an engine dyno, but I think most people assumed that is was a chassis dyno...
Posted by 93mustangt (Member # 680) on
:
Yeah i was talking about a chasis dyno.The heads as far as i know have a port job and ungraded spings.The reason i thought it would make more is because there is people making around 400RWHP na wuth 331's/347's But they use alot more radicle of a cam.What do you think it would run in a full weight 95 gt with 3:90 gears and a good driver?
Posted by 93PONY (Member # 60) on
:
The restrictions in the setup IMO:
The 1 5/8th headers. I hope it's been ported...cause the openings on those headers are quite a bit smaller then the Canfield exhaust ports.
The cam. Although not bad...it would pick up from a wilder setup. I'd go large...since it won't pass smog anyway.
1 3/4 longtubes & a nice little cam & it will put out close to 400RW....as long as everything was built right.
Posted by WANARNM (Member # 587) on
:
Lets see. I cranked out 323hp and 521rwtrq. Both at about 5600rpm.. and i have a ISKY cam with 544/573.. AFR 185's, HOlley intake. And i have 9:1 compre. i say about 320-350 rwhp
Posted by st5150 (Member # 51) on
:
321 rwhp
Posted by N0SL050 (Member # 2719) on
:
solid enough for pulling off 12sec slips all day I would say around 320 - 335 rwhp
Posted by ray95 (Member # 752) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by WANARNM:
Lets see. I cranked out 323hp and 521rwtrq.
That's a type right? One of those numbers don't add up.
Posted by Chris M. (Member # 1708) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by ray95:
quote:
Originally posted by WANARNM:
Lets see. I cranked out 323hp and 521rwtrq.
That's a type right? One of those numbers don't add up.
why do you say that? other than the fact it's impossible to make more torque than hp past 5,200 rpm?
Posted by 93mustangt (Member # 680) on
:
Thanks for the replies.He Is going to have it dynoed in a few weeks when the motor is broken in.
Posted by 99gt-UJSTLST (Member # 584) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by ray95:
quote:
Originally posted by WANARNM:
Lets see. I cranked out 323hp and 521rwtrq.
That's a type right? One of those numbers don't add up.
yea he meant 321 torq
Posted by ray95 (Member # 752) on
:
ok. i figured so.
Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com