This is topic PRO-M OR C&L MASS AIR METER??? in forum Tech Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=6;t=003667
Posted by 92coupe (Member # 1957) on :
 
ok me and 66 ac cobra thought it would be a kinda cool thread to see what everyone thinks bout the 2 brands of mass air meters. so what do you prefer a pro-m or a c&l???? [patriot]
 
Posted by GR40Coupe (Member # 698) on :
 
c&l [patriot]
 
Posted by KCmustangboy (Member # 1927) on :
 
What application???? C&L seems good for starters but I don't think anything beats a Pro-M, However! The Pro-M has to be working correctly. I would say they are not as reliable as a C&L but they are the best when they are working right.
 
Posted by hidnn.o.s. (Member # 1219) on :
 
Never had any bad experiences with Pro-M's.
 
Posted by st5150 (Member # 51) on :
 
A properly calibrated Pro-M is the only way to go. This is a non issue. Once the air fuel ratio is tuned on the dyno, the difference between the two is next to nothing.
 
Posted by mustanggt5091 (Member # 444) on :
 
I haven't heard many good things about C&L in any major HP application's, I would definetly use a Pro-M! Or remember that you pay for what you get!
 
Posted by 92coupe (Member # 1957) on :
 
hmmmm anybody else?????????????
 
Posted by PseudoCobra (Member # 1689) on :
 
I have a C&L truflo inlet tube. May as well just stick with the one brand and get another C&L product if you ask me. [patriot]
 
Posted by Glenn (Member # 520) on :
 
Can you dyno a car with the C&L???
 
Posted by Jdub07 (Member # 1973) on :
 
I have the 76mm C&L. I notcied a huge difference right away. Never had any problems with it. Yet my only comparison is stock vs c&l. I would buy it agian.
 
Posted by Blu50Stang (Member # 489) on :
 
I haven't used a C&L, so no way of knowing which is better. And I put my MAF in at the same time as my Novi 2000, so I wouldn't be able to tell you how much of an improvement I saw over stock either. I use a Pro-M.

[ April 07, 2003, 02:15 PM: Message edited by: Blu50Stang ]
 
Posted by 5LVENOM (Member # 2282) on :
 
I have to say C&L isn't bad for moderate NA power, I had the 73 on my 93lx, But on SC applications, definatly Pro-m, I originally put the C&L 76 on my 95 S-trimmed cobra, and it changed my whole opinion of C&L. For a blower car they are shit, put on the Pro-m 80, and it was 100 times better.
 
Posted by TRY2PAZ (Member # 97) on :
 
Pro-M [Wink]

You need to ask Byron Renyolds. He can tell you why Pro-M is better. I think they are more tuner friendly [Big Grin]
 
Posted by J's DDLY SNK (Member # 2016) on :
 
Bought Pro-M, and made big difference on my Cobra. I would by another Pro-M if I had to choose between the two.
 
Posted by hopdup95 (Member # 2381) on :
 
So does anyone have a Pro-M they want to sell??? Preferably 73 or 76mm, thanks.
 
Posted by 91PONY (Member # 206) on :
 
I've got the Pro-M on my N/A application. The only 'trouble' with it was trying to prove that it was smog legal (no CARB #'s stamped on it)....whereas the C&L uses the stock casing....so it looks stock. I like my
Pro-M....it's perty. [Wink]
 
Posted by 5LVENOM (Member # 2282) on :
 
You mean 75, 77, 80 etc.
 




Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com