Post A Reply
read DMs/my profile
login
|
join CAFords
|
search
|
faq
|
»
Northern California Ford Owners
»
Automotive
»
Tech Talk
»
question about AFR 185s .
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by street_illegal_stang: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by 93PONY: [qb] 185's too big for a 302?!? Come on! Yellow94GT ran VicJr's on a stock 94 GT bottom end & ran 12.4 on motor. VicJr's have 210cc intake ports! 185cc's is not very big at all. 165cc's is tiny! Stock E7 heads are 145cc's. Edelbrock 6037's are 175cc's. TW's are around 185cc's but have a larger cross-sectional area due to the relocated valves.....the cross-sectional area is what you should be concerned about.. The larger the cross-section, the lower the velocity & the less TQ it'll make. FYI, the most powerfull N/A 306 on this site was built 4 years ago & ran ported AFR165's with 2.02 valves & the CC of the intake was at least 180cc's. It made an impressive 340/340RW & had a camshaft that would pass smog. That's a TON of TQ for a 306 with 'large' heads. My wife's 319 ran ported 185's that measured around 195cc's & made 360RWTQ & 388RWHP... No lack of low end on that sucker either! Granted it's not the same as a 347, but it stuck you in the seat pretty damn hard for running a stock crankshaft & 'large' heads. Run the 185's with a stock GT camshaft & 1.7's & it'll make more TQ/HP then the 165's with an E cam. [/qb][/QUOTE] :worship: AFR185 :burnout: [/QB][/QUOTE]
(
how?
)
Instant Emojis
Instant UBB Code
What is UBB Code?
Options
Disable smilies in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Questions/Requests/Suggestions? email CAFords
Fueled by
Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com