This is topic Deal or steal? in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners .
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=061789
Posted by 1FAST93NOTCH (Member # 10722) on
:
If I had the money, I would purchase this.
http://sfbay.craigslist.org/sby/ctd/4871084366.html
Posted by SLOWBACK 67 (Member # 6348) on
:
Not my cup of tea. I'd have to look at it in person to even suggest that the car is worth the asking price. It also says 6 in the description on the right.
Posted by 1FAST93NOTCH (Member # 10722) on
:
scratch what I said.
6 blows ass
[ 2015-02-01, 02:45 PM: Message edited by: 1FAST93NOTCH ]
Posted by SLOWBACK 67 (Member # 6348) on
:
It does say rebuilt 302. They put 302 tags on it. That kinda bothers me a little.
Posted by eldog68 (Member # 12928) on
:
That's in fastback money range. Too much for a coupe. And kinda skecty that you don't show a picture of the motor on a completely restored car. Especially if it has a 302.
Posted by Autumnstang97 (Member # 6111) on
:
IMO- a little high. No engine pics??
Posted by hurting your feelings (Member # 13641) on
:
Was 302 even available in 1966 for a mustang?
Posted by 92_5.0 (Member # 7624) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by hurting your feelings:
Was 302 even available in 1966 for a mustang?
My thought exactly
Posted by 92_5.0 (Member # 7624) on
:
says "completely restored" but has aftermarket stereo.
Posted by SLOWBACK 67 (Member # 6348) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by hurting your feelings:
Was 302 even available in 1966 for a mustang?
Nope. Not till late 67 were they putting them in the Mustang. You could get a the solid grind cam 289 as the performance motor in 66.
[ 2015-02-02, 12:56 PM: Message edited by: SLOWBACK 67 ]
Posted by Z06-FTMFW (Member # 3164) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Autumnstang97:
IMO- a little high. No engine pics??
my was thinking the same thing??
Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com