|
Author
|
Topic: Deal or steal?
|
|
|
SLOWBACK 67
¯
Member # 6348
|
posted
 
 
Not my cup of tea. I'd have to look at it in person to even suggest that the car is worth the asking price. It also says 6 in the description on the right.
--------------------
Originally posted by turbo50:
I have no intenions of keeping anyones parts or taking anyones money.
Posts: 8582 | From: Vallejo | Registered: Dec 2005
| :
|
|
1FAST93NOTCH
¯
Member # 10722
|
posted
scratch what I said.
6 blows ass
[ 2015-02-01, 02:45 PM: Message edited by: 1FAST93NOTCH ]
--------------------
2014 Oxford White Raptor Production #: 30727
1993 Red Notchback Production #: 29409
1993 Teal Cobra Production #: 4505
TEAM TRUE FORGED
Posts: 672 | From: SSF | Registered: Mar 2011
| :
|
|
SLOWBACK 67
¯
Member # 6348
|
posted
It does say rebuilt 302. They put 302 tags on it. That kinda bothers me a little.
--------------------
Originally posted by turbo50:
I have no intenions of keeping anyones parts or taking anyones money.
Posts: 8582 | From: Vallejo | Registered: Dec 2005
| :
|
|
eldog68
¯
Member # 12928
|
posted
That's in fastback money range. Too much for a coupe. And kinda skecty that you don't show a picture of the motor on a completely restored car. Especially if it has a 302.
Posts: 263 | From: el Dorado hills | Registered: May 2013
| :
|
|
NonOpSlow2V
¯
Member # 6111
|
posted
IMO- a little high. No engine pics??
--------------------
1997 Autumn Orange GT vert
1996 Mystic Cobra
2005 95ci Harley Road King
2011 F150 Raptor
Posts: 2139 | From: San Francisco | Registered: Oct 2005
| :
|
|
hurting your feelings
¯
Member # 13641
|
posted
Was 302 even available in 1966 for a mustang?
Posts: 1830 | From: In front of the bank with a 45 an a ski mask | Registered: Jun 2014
| :
|
|
92_5.0
¯
Member # 7624
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by hurting your feelings:
Was 302 even available in 1966 for a mustang?
My thought exactly
--------------------
Infineon/Sears point? same difference!
11.8 @ 115 mph @ Sac Raceway
411 rwhp 402 trq (old set up)
540 rwhp 517 rwtrq (new set up)
ET's to come
Posts: 1629 | From: bay area | Registered: May 2007
| :
|
|
92_5.0
¯
Member # 7624
|
posted
says "completely restored" but has aftermarket stereo.
--------------------
Infineon/Sears point? same difference!
11.8 @ 115 mph @ Sac Raceway
411 rwhp 402 trq (old set up)
540 rwhp 517 rwtrq (new set up)
ET's to come
Posts: 1629 | From: bay area | Registered: May 2007
| :
|
|
SLOWBACK 67
¯
Member # 6348
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by hurting your feelings:
Was 302 even available in 1966 for a mustang?
Nope. Not till late 67 were they putting them in the Mustang. You could get a the solid grind cam 289 as the performance motor in 66.
[ 2015-02-02, 12:56 PM: Message edited by: SLOWBACK 67 ]
--------------------
Originally posted by turbo50:
I have no intenions of keeping anyones parts or taking anyones money.
Posts: 8582 | From: Vallejo | Registered: Dec 2005
| :
|
|
Gnari-Garage
CAFords OG
Member # 3164
|
posted
quote:
Originally posted by Autumnstang97:
IMO- a little high. No engine pics??
my was thinking the same thing??
--------------------
2017 McLaren 570GT
2019 Audi S5
2017 Tundra 7" Lift, 37" Tires
Posts: 4017 | From: 916-sacramento | Registered: Aug 2003
| :
|
|
Email this post to someone!
Printer friendly view of this Ford topic
