This is topic Eleanor this..... in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=059176
Posted by CAStang (Member # 9568) on :
 
Not sure if it's a repost, but awesome either way!

http://youtu.be/hRJfS9sfyIk
 
Posted by losbadgts (Member # 4394) on :
 
For some reason I dont like vids that show so many seens at once, so fucking annoying. Two the car looks clean but looks like a camaro in the front and also the tail lights. Wack
 
Posted by SwEeT03Gt (Member # 10283) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by losbadgts:
For some reason I dont like vids that show so many seens at once, so fucking annoying. Two the car looks clean but looks like a camaro in the front and also the tail lights. Wack
and it has a unicorn lol
 
Posted by CAStang (Member # 9568) on :
 
$250-300k

"Featuring many of the styling elements of iconic cars from the sixties, the 2014 Equus Bass 770 is a completely new take on classic American muscle packed with a lot of today’s automobile technology. The car’s most noticeable design influence is clearly the sloping lines of the Fastback Mustang, but there are some hints of past Camaros and Challengers as well.

But make no mistake about, with a starting price of $250,000, the Bass 770 is far from your typical old school ride.

The car, built by the Detroit-based Equss Automotive, is powered by a handcrafted 6.2-liter aluminum supercharged 640 horsepower V8 engine with 605 lb-ft. of torque matted to a six-speed rear mounted dual-clutch transmission, which is good for 0-60 mph in 3.4 seconds and a top speed of 200 mph – according to the company’s official website. Other performance features include Brembo carbon ceramic brakes, a magnetic suspension system, and a performance traction management system."


Read more: http://www.digitaltrends.com/photogalleries/new-2014-equus-bass-770-should-win-over-even-the-least-likely-of-muscle-car-fans/#ixzz2fPL30AUR
Follow us: @digitaltrends on Twitter | digitaltrendsftw on Facebook

[ 2013-09-19, 10:28 PM: Message edited by: CAStang ]
 
Posted by BLK66FB (Member # 8282) on :
 
Personally for that kind of money I would rather buy an actual 66-67 mustang fastback frame and dump 100k into it. Still be badass with better looking lines.
 
Posted by CAStang (Member # 9568) on :
 
I agree, it can be built better for less, but still looks like a fun drive. I wouldn't mind having one in my garage, but not for the price mentioned.
 
Posted by i (Member # 12534) on :
 
i fall asllepp
 
Posted by 68dustin (Member # 5388) on :
 
HOLY SHIT.. 250K..
 
Posted by SLOWBACK 67 (Member # 6348) on :
 
Did they really put a Chevy motor in it?
 
Posted by Black 02 SS (Member # 5939) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by SLOWBACK 67:
Did they really put a Chevy motor in it?
I think I do spy an LS3 under the hood, possibly even the dry sump system.

I LOVE the integration of all the modern features (GPS, TPMS, heated seats, etc) into a classic muscle styled car. So SICK.
 




Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com