This is topic What numbers should I expect 1/4 mile in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=059026

---

Posted by SS_Super_Stang (Member # 11510) on :
 
Got a 94 gt with 4.10s typhoon intake 65mm throtle body. N shorty equal lengths. In just wondering If any one ever ran a similar set up at the track. I'm gonna wait till the 50reasons event to run it but would like an idea on what numbers to expect. Any input is welcome.
 

---

Posted by Pure Stang (Member # 7251) on :
 
Driving the shit out of it on slicks high 13's if you're lucky. Takes a little more for the sn95's
 

---

Posted by Cobra 93-4992 (Member # 4992) on :
 
14.7s
 

---

Posted by NEIGHT (Member # 8741) on :
 
14.06
 

---

Posted by SLOW95GTS (Member # 10365) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Pure Stang:
Driving the shit out of it on slicks high 13's if you're lucky. Takes a little more for the sn95's

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by SLOW95GTS:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Pure Stang:
Driving the shit out of it on slicks high 13's if you're lucky. Takes a little more for the sn95's

---

Lol

---

Did I miss the joke
 

---

Posted by 2T0NE (Member # 4216) on :
 
My cafords quarter mile calculator says 14.3
 

---

Posted by SIC9250 (Member # 8216) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 2T0NE:
My cafords quarter mile calculator says 14.3

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Pure Stang:

quote:

---

Originally posted by SLOW95GTS:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Pure Stang:
Driving the shit out of it on slicks high 13's if you're lucky. Takes a little more for the sn95's

---

Lol

---

Did I miss the joke

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by SLOW95GTS:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Pure Stang:

quote:

---

Originally posted by SLOW95GTS:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Pure Stang:
Driving the shit out of it on slicks high 13's if you're lucky. Takes a little more for the sn95's

---

Lol

---

Did I miss the joke

---

I just love the reputation of the slow sn95, gets me every time.
And I think 2tone is right on the money.

---

Sorry man an sn95 mod for mod gets beat by the fox everytime...this has been known for years,in my o2 an sn95 is a superior car brakes,chassis,comfort wise but the fox get its done when it comes to a drag race

1994-1995 computers: The TM40�s (94-95 GT computer) processor runs 3x the clock speed of the fox body processor and is based off of Volumetric Efficiency (VE) The TM40 also many more parameters to tune with but also has many built in timing retards that need to be addressed which is the main reason why 1994-1995 Mustangs are slower than a comparable fox body Mustang. In 1994 Ford did a major redesign of both the computer hardware and software which resulted in a smoother running and more emissions friendly car.
 

---

Posted by SIC9250 (Member # 8216) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by SS_Super_Stang:
Dam ok I guess a gota start the piggy bank for some real go fast inventory. I swear this car jumps better than my 97 cobra n that was a high 13 car from manufacture. I guess I'm a little to exited over it

---

It may "feel" faster but did your cobra have 410s as well?? The initial low end power feels good in a pushrod but get them revs up there and a 96 cobra with 410s would pull from your 5.0 very badly,not hating in anyway man I've owned 2 SN 5.0s and loved both of em great cars! My first one had over 230k OG longblock with bolt-ons and ran great! Also went 14.0s

[ 2013-08-31, 01:37 PM: Message edited by: SIC9250 ]
 

---

Posted by SLOW95GTS (Member # 10365) on :
 
Yeah I've had both, a nice e7 headed 86 gt stock with exhaust and pullies ran 14.5, and now this 95 GTS. But that 86 became a pain to drive sometimes.
 

---

Posted by 98 ROUSH (Member # 10309) on :
 
14.4
 

---

Posted by a302juGRnot (Member # 10163) on :
 
U should update this thread when u go.
 

---

Posted by SS_Super_Stang (Member # 11510) on :
 
I will keep everyone posted. I'm hoping to throw some 1.7 rr before I go. See what happens.
 

---

Posted by Venomousnotch (Member # 8695) on :
 
I would say 14.7's
 

---

Posted by Bulletsponge (Member # 9529) on :
 
Coupe 5ohh ran a 13.6 with gears, longtubes and drag radials.
 

---

Posted by moeofit32 (Member # 10393) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Bulletsponge:
Coupe 5ohh ran a 13.6 with gears, longtubes and drag radials.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by 50Reasons:
I would do a b cam with those 1.7s and a bump in timing and a lil more fuel and you should be in the 13s. And a h pipe of course to let her breathe

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by moeofit32:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Bulletsponge:
Coupe 5ohh ran a 13.6 with gears, longtubes and drag radials.

---

i believe he had a cam and some other things too if it was his white one

---

His white one was 14.1 best, I have his car on video when we went too the track with SlowSN95 aswell, who also ran a 14.0 Flat (he can chime in) with 4.10s and a K&N On his 5.0.

But, his current red one went 13.6 @98 with 3.73s and longtubes with drag radials.
 

---

Posted by quickblue302 (Member # 7912) on :
 
if your lucky, as quick as this beast..lol



 

---

Posted by coupe5oh (Member # 10411) on :
 
I ran a 13.6 with longtubes, 3.73s, drag radials and rear drag shocks
 

---