This is topic Finally put my car on the dyno for a baseline: Pics and vid in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=057972

Posted by jaehow23 (Member # 11230) on :
 
When I purchased this car, I wasn't worried about numbers or power; I just wanted the car to look good and sound nice. Well, I've done those two things already so now it's time to go faster! Slowly, but surly lol.

Mods: JLT Next Gen CAI, UPR o/r X-pipe, Pypes M-80s...no tune.


254rwhp 292rwtq

It was done on a Dynojet machine, and SOMEONE was telling me that's why my numbers were so high...but, there were about 5 or 6 cars that had been dyno'd and tuned recently that made LESS power than the other places they were tuned at. I had two pulls and the numbers were pretty much identical. So, rain on my parade if you must but I don't see why they would try to hype MY numbers up lol.

my lady holding the sheet:
 -

the full sheet:
 -

The video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fzb9ObkDvXU


bonus:
 -
 
Posted by MaK_1967v8 (Member # 12187) on :
 
whats done to it? just exhaust, and an air intake? thats not bad seeing how they claim 260 from the factory.
 
Posted by jaehow23 (Member # 11230) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MaK_1967v8:
whats done to it? just exhaust, and an air intake? thats not bad seeing how they claim 260 from the factory.

yea that's all that I have done. And that 260 rating is at the crank, correct?
 
Posted by jmcclesk (Member # 1355) on :
 
more info on the car please
 
Posted by MaK_1967v8 (Member # 12187) on :
 
Pretty much, Most cars at a dealer that advertise their horse/torque statistics is at the crank. so if you're putting 254 to the wheels, thats not bad at all!

You should look into getting 4.10s in the back. I have a stock 2004 roush ( never been dyno'd ) but it pulls on a friend of mines 2004 GT and he has headers, X pipe, magnapacks, short shifter, JLT intake, larger throttle body and intake.

you'll take a bit in the MPG department with gears, but its not unbearable.
 
Posted by jaehow23 (Member # 11230) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jmcclesk:
more info on the car please

what other info do you want? a list of mods is in the original post though..


quote:
Originally posted by MaK_1967v8:
Pretty much, Most cars at a dealer that advertise their horse/torque statistics is at the crank. so if you're putting 254 to the wheels, thats not bad at all!

You should look into getting 4.10s in the back. I have a stock 2004 roush ( never been dyno'd ) but it pulls on a friend of mines 2004 GT and he has headers, X pipe, magnapacks, short shifter, JLT intake, larger throttle body and intake.

you'll take a bit in the MPG department with gears, but its not unbearable.

yep, I have my 4.10s ready to be installed actually. I'm waiting on a PM back from someone selling a tuner then the gears will go in. can't wait.
 
Posted by gohardgohome (Member # 9803) on :
 
More pictures of your lady holding the sheet FTW!!!! [Big Grin]

[ 2013-05-05, 01:43 PM: Message edited by: gohardgohome ]
 
Posted by jaehow23 (Member # 11230) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by gohardgohome:
More pictures of your lady holding the sheet FTW!!!! [Big Grin]

Lol
 
Posted by MaK_1967v8 (Member # 12187) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jaehow23:
quote:
Originally posted by jmcclesk:
more info on the car please

what other info do you want? a list of mods is in the original post though..


quote:
Originally posted by MaK_1967v8:
Pretty much, Most cars at a dealer that advertise their horse/torque statistics is at the crank. so if you're putting 254 to the wheels, thats not bad at all!

You should look into getting 4.10s in the back. I have a stock 2004 roush ( never been dyno'd ) but it pulls on a friend of mines 2004 GT and he has headers, X pipe, magnapacks, short shifter, JLT intake, larger throttle body and intake.

you'll take a bit in the MPG department with gears, but its not unbearable.

yep, I have my 4.10s ready to be installed actually. I'm waiting on a PM back from someone selling a tuner then the gears will go in. can't wait.

good shit man! put a 91 octane tune on that thing and itll free up some horse too! You should hit up SacStangDriver for the 4.10 swap. he does good work at a reasonable price.
 
Posted by a302juGRnot (Member # 10163) on :
 
thats a baaad lookin ride!
 
Posted by SIC9250 (Member # 8216) on :
 
You gotta healthy 2v J!! Sounds fuckn sick too loud an not givin a F@&$ just the way I like it lol
 
Posted by jaehow23 (Member # 11230) on :
 
Sic and a302 I appreciate it guys. I'm happy with how it looks...took a little longer than expected but it was worth the wait.
 
Posted by 2T0NE (Member # 4216) on :
 
Looks wet
 
Posted by Mr.10psi (Member # 11062) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by jaehow23:
When I purchased this car, I wasn't worried about numbers or power; I just wanted the car to look good and sound nice. Well, I've done those two things already so now it's time to go faster! Slowly, but surly lol.

Mods: JLT Next Gen CAI, UPR o/r X-pipe, Pypes M-80s...no tune.


254rwhp 292rwtq

It was done on a Dynojet machine, and SOMEONE was telling me that's why my numbers were so high...but, there were about 5 or 6 cars that had been dyno'd and tuned recently that made LESS power than the other places they were tuned at. I had two pulls and the numbers were pretty much identical. So, rain on my parade if you must but I don't see why they would try to hype MY numbers up lol.

my lady holding the sheet:
 -

the full sheet:
 -

The video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fzb9ObkDvXU


bonus:
 -

actually jaehow this dyno is the most accurate dyno ive ever been on. I dynoed a 2012 5.0 bone stock and it made 365rwhp back to back multiple times. Its the only dyno i trust so i say your numbers are right, looks like you got a healthy motor. Nice car btw.
 
Posted by jaehow23 (Member # 11230) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Mr.10psi:
quote:
Originally posted by jaehow23:


Mods: JLT Next Gen CAI, UPR o/r X-pipe, Pypes M-80s...no tune.


254rwhp 292rwtq


actually jaehow this dyno is the most accurate dyno ive ever been on. I dynoed a 2012 5.0 bone stock and it made 365rwhp back to back multiple times. Its the only dyno i trust so i say your numbers are right, looks like you got a healthy motor. Nice car btw.
well that makes me feel a lot better actually. I'll consider these true #s.
 
Posted by fstryde3 (Member # 8436) on :
 
Cars looking good man long time no see, nice numbers and lady BTW
 
Posted by jaehow23 (Member # 11230) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by fstryde3:
Cars looking good man long time no see, nice numbers and lady BTW

yea it's been a while..how are you? Thank you for the compliments, sir.
 
Posted by losbadgts (Member # 4394) on :
 
Clean car. Nice numbers.
 
Posted by i (Member # 12534) on :
 
cool rims! [Wink]
 
Posted by Pittsburg Mustang Owner (Member # 6100) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by gohardgohome:
More pictures of your lady holding the sheet FTW!!!! [Big Grin]

you from NT Jae...you know the rules..
 




Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com