This is topic 351 notchback or 350 z28 in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners .
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=054455
Posted by 86 mustang gt (Member # 10848) on
:
Looking into buying a car don't really want anything smaller than an ls1 taught I would ask if you can compare a 351 notch back with an ls1 trans am or ls1 camaro, which would be faster? Of course the 351 wouldn't have stock heads or manifold
Posted by 2T0NE (Member # 4216) on
:
ls1
Posted by 5.0 LsX (Member # 10017) on
:
ls1 in the notch
Posted by SwEeT 03 Gt (Member # 10283) on
:
351
Posted by warhorse58gt (Member # 7702) on
:
hands down a coupe with a 351w!
Posted by 86 mustang gt (Member # 10848) on
:
No I've never liked ford and Chevy mixing up I like both but its either one or the other, I know the ls1 run about 13.3 quarter mile what would a 351 fox body run? With a mild set up
Posted by 86 mustang gt (Member # 10848) on
:
Oh no disrespect bro didn't see u have an ls1 in your coupe, nice car, is it a big difference as if u were to have a 302 in it?
Posted by Smoked50 (Member # 9592) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by 86 mustang gt:
No I've never liked ford and Chevy mixing up I like both but its either one or the other, I know the ls1 run about 13.3 quarter mile what would a 351 fox body run? With a mild set up
Depends on how mild, I've seen them run mid 11s to mid 12s, throw on a turbo or supercharger and break 10s all day.
Posted by 86 mustang gt (Member # 10848) on
:
Oh no disrespect bro didn't see u have an ls1 in your coupe, nice car, is it a big difference as if u were to have a 302 in it?
Posted by warhorse58gt (Member # 7702) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Smoked50:
quote:
Originally posted by 86 mustang gt:
No I've never liked ford and Chevy mixing up I like both but its either one or the other, I know the ls1 run about 13.3 quarter mile what would a 351 fox body run? With a mild set up
Depends on how mild, I've seen them run mid 11s to mid 12s, throw on a turbo or supercharger and break 10s all day.
mid 10's all day. ask me how i know.
Posted by 86 mustang gt (Member # 10848) on
:
Is your car Carb or efi, what tranny.?
Posted by NEIGHT (Member # 8741) on
:
Are you serious!? ![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
351w!
Posted by 5.0 LsX (Member # 10017) on
:
huge difference. stock ls1 in the coupe is low 12s all day with street tires. great street car with suspension and rear. easy 11 sec car with ls2 or 3, and it will still sound stock and get 28mpg with a 6speed, hard to beat imo
Posted by triple b (Member # 8763) on
:
u go to the track much?.....compair what a notch 302 walking camaros and ss all nite hows that for comparison
Posted by 510cpskid (Member # 8277) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by 5.0 LsX:
huge difference. stock ls1 in the coupe is low 12s all day with street tires. great street car with suspension and rear. easy 11 sec car with ls2 or 3, and it will still sound stock and get 28mpg with a 6speed, hard to beat imo
Are you walking on 347's
Posted by GoldToes (Member # 9987) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by warhorse58gt:
quote:
Originally posted by Smoked50:
quote:
Originally posted by 86 mustang gt:
No I've never liked ford and Chevy mixing up I like both but its either one or the other, I know the ls1 run about 13.3 quarter mile what would a 351 fox body run? With a mild set up
Depends on how mild, I've seen them run mid 11s to mid 12s, throw on a turbo or supercharger and break 10s all day.
mid 10's all day. ask me how i know.
Lol, thought you run 9's though..
Posted by Slowback67 (Member # 6348) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by warhorse58gt:
hands down a coupe with a 351w!
^ This.
I'd have to win the lotto to even consider buying a Chevy. If I did it would be a 67-69 camaro with a TT BBF just to be a jerk.
Posted by Robb (Member # 9444) on
:
I'll take the ls1 camaro
Posted by 86 mustang gt (Member # 10848) on
:
What do you guys think of a coupe on l.a Craigslist with a 351 with trick flow heads for 6800
Posted by warhorse58gt (Member # 7702) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by GoldToes:
quote:
Originally posted by warhorse58gt:
quote:
Originally posted by Smoked50:
quote:
Originally posted by 86 mustang gt:
No I've never liked ford and Chevy mixing up I like both but its either one or the other, I know the ls1 run about 13.3 quarter mile what would a 351 fox body run? With a mild set up
Depends on how mild, I've seen them run mid 11s to mid 12s, throw on a turbo or supercharger and break 10s all day.
mid 10's all day. ask me how i know.
Lol, thought you run 9's though..
i do on the hit. ![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
Posted by phildog (Member # 1214) on
:
An LS1 is not a 350, ya genious.
Posted by ISP89LX (Member # 8949) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by phildog:
An LS1 is not a 350, ya genious.
lol isn't it a 346?
Posted by 88cobraclone (Member # 10958) on
:
Notchback ![[worship]](graemlins/worship.gif)
all day
Posted by 50Reasons (Member # 6452) on
:
Get the coupe.... duh
Posted by warhorse58gt (Member # 7702) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by Robb:
I'll take the ls1 camaro
and get ran off on every time. ![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
Posted by JZTRK (Member # 7641) on
:
351W punched out to a 408 is my next move
Posted by 86 mustang gt (Member # 10848) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by JZTRK:
351W punched out to a 408 is my next move
Sounds like a pretty good project bro
Posted by svfreerider87 (Member # 5748) on
:
the ls1 will give the car a better weight balance, bolt ons and parts are a little cheaper, it runs more efficient, a 351 would have to be built pretty agressively to compete with a modded ls. i've had both a 408 stroker and a ls1, in their respected cars of course, i'd honestly say I liked the ls1 better, more efficient, less torque but i wasn't rock crawling, lol, and i'm speaking of ls1 swapped into fox vs 351, ls1 in a f body or vettes are completely different beasts.
Posted by 86 mustang gt (Member # 10848) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by svfreerider87:
the ls1 will give the car a better weight balance, bolt ons and parts are a little cheaper, it runs more efficient, a 351 would have to be built pretty agressively to compete with a modded ls. i've had both a 408 stroker and a ls1, in their respected cars of course, i'd honestly say I liked the ls1 better, more efficient, less torque but i wasn't rock crawling, lol, and i'm speaking of ls1 swapped into fox vs 351, ls1 in a f body or vettes are completely different beasts.
Posted by 86 mustang gt (Member # 10848) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by svfreerider87:
the ls1 will give the car a better weight balance, bolt ons and parts are a little cheaper, it runs more efficient, a 351 would have to be built pretty agressively to compete with a modded ls. i've had both a 408 stroker and a ls1, in their respected cars of course, i'd honestly say I liked the ls1 better, more efficient, less torque but i wasn't rock crawling, lol, and i'm speaking of ls1 swapped into fox vs 351, ls1 in a f body or vettes are completely different beasts.
Thanks good info bro
Posted by warhorse58gt (Member # 7702) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by svfreerider87:
the ls1 will give the car a better weight balance, bolt ons and parts are a little cheaper, it runs more efficient, a 351 would have to be built pretty agressively to compete with a modded ls. i've had both a 408 stroker and a ls1, in their respected cars of course, i'd honestly say I liked the ls1 better, more efficient, less torque but i wasn't rock crawling, lol, and i'm speaking of ls1 swapped into fox vs 351, ls1 in a f body or vettes are completely different beasts.
if you call 8.5 to 1 comp, 354ci, & custom blower cam. "pretty agressive" runs 10.5x's in a t-top car on 91. hell, bet i could run that fast on 87 if i tried.
Posted by svfreerider87 (Member # 5748) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by warhorse58gt:
quote:
Originally posted by svfreerider87:
the ls1 will give the car a better weight balance, bolt ons and parts are a little cheaper, it runs more efficient, a 351 would have to be built pretty agressively to compete with a modded ls. i've had both a 408 stroker and a ls1, in their respected cars of course, i'd honestly say I liked the ls1 better, more efficient, less torque but i wasn't rock crawling, lol, and i'm speaking of ls1 swapped into fox vs 351, ls1 in a f body or vettes are completely different beasts.
if you call 8.5 to 1 comp, 354ci, & custom blower cam. "pretty agressive" runs 10.5x's in a t-top car on 91. hell, bet i could run that fast on 87 if i tried.
i'd call that dart block pretty agressive, lol.
Posted by warhorse58gt (Member # 7702) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by svfreerider87:
quote:
Originally posted by warhorse58gt:
quote:
Originally posted by svfreerider87:
the ls1 will give the car a better weight balance, bolt ons and parts are a little cheaper, it runs more efficient, a 351 would have to be built pretty agressively to compete with a modded ls. i've had both a 408 stroker and a ls1, in their respected cars of course, i'd honestly say I liked the ls1 better, more efficient, less torque but i wasn't rock crawling, lol, and i'm speaking of ls1 swapped into fox vs 351, ls1 in a f body or vettes are completely different beasts.
if you call 8.5 to 1 comp, 354ci, & custom blower cam. "pretty agressive" runs 10.5x's in a t-top car on 91. hell, bet i could run that fast on 87 if i tried.
i'd call that dart block pretty agressive, lol.
why? because it's stronger than a stock block? a dart block don't make more power than a stock block, it can handle more power. i can take my h/c/i and put them on a stock short block and make the same power that i am making na.
Posted by svfreerider87 (Member # 5748) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by warhorse58gt:
quote:
Originally posted by svfreerider87:
quote:
Originally posted by warhorse58gt:
quote:
Originally posted by svfreerider87:
the ls1 will give the car a better weight balance, bolt ons and parts are a little cheaper, it runs more efficient, a 351 would have to be built pretty agressively to compete with a modded ls. i've had both a 408 stroker and a ls1, in their respected cars of course, i'd honestly say I liked the ls1 better, more efficient, less torque but i wasn't rock crawling, lol, and i'm speaking of ls1 swapped into fox vs 351, ls1 in a f body or vettes are completely different beasts.
if you call 8.5 to 1 comp, 354ci, & custom blower cam. "pretty agressive" runs 10.5x's in a t-top car on 91. hell, bet i could run that fast on 87 if i tried.
i'd call that dart block pretty agressive, lol.
why? because it's stronger than a stock block? a dart block don't make more power than a stock block, it can handle more power. i can take my h/c/i and put them on a stock short block and make the same power that i am making na.
well you've got machining, balancing, the cost of your rotating assembly, that's quite a bit different than a 351 swap, that's a custom motor. not knocking it I love your car it's super sleeper, but i'm pretty sure he's not trying to bracket race this thing and run 9's.
Posted by warhorse58gt (Member # 7702) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by svfreerider87:
quote:
Originally posted by warhorse58gt:
quote:
Originally posted by svfreerider87:
quote:
Originally posted by warhorse58gt:
quote:
Originally posted by svfreerider87:
the ls1 will give the car a better weight balance, bolt ons and parts are a little cheaper, it runs more efficient, a 351 would have to be built pretty agressively to compete with a modded ls. i've had both a 408 stroker and a ls1, in their respected cars of course, i'd honestly say I liked the ls1 better, more efficient, less torque but i wasn't rock crawling, lol, and i'm speaking of ls1 swapped into fox vs 351, ls1 in a f body or vettes are completely different beasts.
if you call 8.5 to 1 comp, 354ci, & custom blower cam. "pretty agressive" runs 10.5x's in a t-top car on 91. hell, bet i could run that fast on 87 if i tried.
i'd call that dart block pretty agressive, lol.
why? because it's stronger than a stock block? a dart block don't make more power than a stock block, it can handle more power. i can take my h/c/i and put them on a stock short block and make the same power that i am making na.
well you've got machining, balancing, the cost of your rotating assembly, that's quite a bit different than a 351 swap, that's a custom motor. not knocking it I love your car it's super sleeper, but i'm pretty sure he's not trying to bracket race this thing and run 9's.
sure mine is a custom motor, and i paid more for my crank & block than most will pay for their whole motor. but i'm going for 8.9x's so of course, i got way better than a stock block. but that don't mean i can't take my h/c/i off my motor, and make the same na power on a stock long block. i bet i make more. with 9 to 1 comp.
Posted by phildog (Member # 1214) on
:
Ahhh yes, the ever lasting question which has no answers. I think the best way to pose this question of 351w versus LS1 is this: if you have two good running engines, stock 351w and a stock LS1, and had 2k to spend on it, which motor woul be faster?
LS1 would piss on the Windsor. Done.
Posted by 510cpskid (Member # 8277) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by phildog:
Ahhh yes, the ever lasting question which has no answers. I think the best way to pose this question of 351w versus LS1 is this: if you have two good running engines, stock 351w and a stock LS1, and had 2k to spend on it, which motor woul be faster?
LS1 would piss on the Windsor. Done.
And piss its guts out of its ass the first time you get on it
Posted by sneakyfox90 (Member # 9379) on
:
If ur a noob get a ls1
If ur a man build a 351w
Posted by sneakyfox90 (Member # 9379) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by phildog:
Ahhh yes, the ever lasting question which has no answers. I think the best way to pose this question of 351w versus LS1 is this: if you have two good running engines, stock 351w and a stock LS1, and had 2k to spend on it, which motor woul be faster?
LS1 would piss on the Windsor. Done.
a good running 351w is cheaper than a good running ls1 to start with so u already got more money in the the ls1 before the 2k budget lol!
Posted by TACH2MX (Member # 9987) on
:
LS1 bruh !!!
Posted by 2T0NE (Member # 4216) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by TACH2MX:
LS1 bruh !!!
Posted by 2T0NE (Member # 4216) on
:
ok ok .... 351 w/gt40s
Posted by JUNKYARD5.0 (Member # 10398) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by 2T0NE:
ok ok .... 351 w/gt40s
Posted by wichoms4 (Member # 10900) on
:
by the way a ls1 is not a 350ci. its a lil 346ci
Posted by wichoms4 (Member # 10900) on
:
& how did i know warhorse was going to hate...hahaha get a LS1... or if you want real horse power get a 502ci LSX small block..
Posted by 86 mustang gt (Member # 10848) on
:
Get 40 heads? Would be real cheap good heads lol I wonder if the t5 tranny can handle the 351
Posted by svfreerider87 (Member # 5748) on
:
man so many ls1 haters, to all you with negative feedback, have any of you owned, driven, or built an ls engine? they're fuckin sick, but so was my 408windsor stroker, but they definitely aren't comparable, the ls1 can be stroked, cammed to the max, and still be really driveable, the 408 or 351 on the other hand not so daily driveable, we're talking about two drastically different motors, if going straight is all you wanna do then by all means build a windsor, although the ls's aren't bad for that either, there's an 02 ss out of sac that runs in the nines with stock 346 longblock, ms3 cam, longtubes, 200 shot, and a faast intake.
Posted by warhorse58gt (Member # 7702) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by wichoms4:
& how did i know warhorse was going to hate...hahaha get a LS1... or if you want real horse power get a 502ci LSX small block..
hate? really? more like your seem to be the one hating on the 351? bring your ls1 bruh and i'll drag it down the 1320! lol 351c 4v will shit all over a cammed ls1 with just a intake! with a motor not made since 73. ![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
edit: noticed all the bad ass ls1 taking my call out!
[ May 30, 2012, 04:03 AM: Message edited by: warhorse58gt ]
Posted by warhorse58gt (Member # 7702) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by svfreerider87:
man so many ls1 haters, to all you with negative feedback, have any of you owned, driven, or built an ls engine? they're fuckin sick, but so was my 408windsor stroker, but they definitely aren't comparable, the ls1 can be stroked, cammed to the max, and still be really driveable, the 408 or 351 on the other hand not so daily driveable, we're talking about two drastically different motors, if going straight is all you wanna do then by all means build a windsor, although the ls's aren't bad for that either, there's an 02 ss out of sac that runs in the nines with stock 346 longblock, ms3 cam, longtubes, 200 shot, and a faast intake.
then you sir are doing it wrong. my 623hp on 91 octane ran just fine on the street. 100% problem free. even drove it from stockton to sac clicked off 10.4x's @ 131. in a car with only 4:10's. why all the hate for the 351 on a ford site? maybe if you guys got off the nuts of the ls1 you might learn something.
[ May 30, 2012, 04:02 AM: Message edited by: warhorse58gt ]
Posted by highway21 (Member # 10516) on
:
In reality its up to you... obviously with the 351 you get a little more displacement and you keep the car 100% ford.. upside to having a ls1 is there all aluminum (super lite compared to the 351).. and there super easy to tune and respond well to minor mods.. ls1 vs 351 in a fox i would put a ls1 hands down just because of the weight savings alone. but i plan to put my 408 on spray in my fox just because i already own a ls1 f body.. so like to keep one car all ford and one car all gm ;-)
edit - just seen you were talking about ls1 fbody vs 351w fox... would be a drivers race with a H/C/I 351 vs H/C/I ls1.. all around nice car would be the f body (trans am) cough cough lol
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=70kBnEK9rSY
[ May 30, 2012, 10:14 AM: Message edited by: highway21 ]
Posted by NEIGHT (Member # 8741) on
:
Just kuz you lost to LS1 or ur car is built like shit don't mean a LS1 is badass.... CaliforniaFORDS.com ![[Wink]](wink.gif)
Posted by JUNKYARD5.0 (Member # 10398) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by svfreerider87:
man so many ls1 haters, to all you with negative feedback, have any of you owned, driven, or built an ls engine?
Same question goes to the guys who have negative feedback about the 351, have you ever owned, driven, or built a 351?
Posted by Pure Stang (Member # 7251) on
:
Jdm vtech turbo dood real fast like rocket.... Lol
Posted by TACH2MX (Member # 9987) on
:
Hater's gon Hate, LS1 BRUH !!!
Posted by sneakyfox90 (Member # 9379) on
:
Whoever says a built ls1 is more streetable than a built 351
YOU'RE THE HATER bottom line n doesn't know shit about building a motor
[ May 30, 2012, 03:38 PM: Message edited by: sneakyfox90 ]
Posted by TACH2MX (Member # 9987) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by sneakyfox90:
Whoever says a built ls1 is more streetable than a built 351
YOU'RE THE HATER bottom line n doesn't know shit about building a motor
Hater's gon Hate, LS1 BRUH !!!
Posted by sneakyfox90 (Member # 9379) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by TACH2MX:
quote:
Originally posted by sneakyfox90:
Whoever says a built ls1 is more streetable than a built 351
YOU'RE THE HATER bottom line n doesn't know shit about building a motor
Hater's gon Hate, LS1 BRUH !!!
Have u ever built a motor before sir?
Can u tell me what makes an ls1, (in your eyes) superior?
Posted by TACH2MX (Member # 9987) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by sneakyfox90:
quote:
Originally posted by TACH2MX:
quote:
Originally posted by sneakyfox90:
Whoever says a built ls1 is more streetable than a built 351
YOU'RE THE HATER bottom line n doesn't know shit about building a motor
Hater's gon Hate, LS1 BRUH !!!
Have u ever built a motor before sir?
Can u tell me what makes an ls1, (in your eyes) superior?
Calm your ass down sucka, lol. I was just messing with ya. And yes I have built ford motors that you could only dream of building. All you gotta do is go to my albums.
Posted by sneakyfox90 (Member # 9379) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by TACH2MX:
quote:
Originally posted by sneakyfox90:
quote:
Originally posted by TACH2MX:
quote:
Originally posted by sneakyfox90:
Whoever says a built ls1 is more streetable than a built 351
YOU'RE THE HATER bottom line n doesn't know shit about building a motor
Hater's gon Hate, LS1 BRUH !!!
Have u ever built a motor before sir?
Can u tell me what makes an ls1, (in your eyes) superior?
Calm your ass down sucka, lol. I was just messing with ya. And yes I have built ford motors that you could only dream of building. All you gotta do is go to my albums.
Well than u should know as well I as do that ls1s ain't got shit on a 351 built properly
And I see no money to be saved by going ls1 route
[ May 30, 2012, 04:14 PM: Message edited by: sneakyfox90 ]
Posted by TACH2MX (Member # 9987) on
:
I feel ya bruh., i gets down. I've built some basic h/c/i s/c combos. They go for sure. My boy runs 10's on a junkyard build= 4cyl picknpull notch/ f150 5.8 shortblock,/ EdL alum. heads/ demon carb/ stock AOD. and a 150 shot. He ran it a few times at Sac raceway before it blew. Since he put a 408 bottom end/ same setup same car and now runs low 9's. Before the stroker kit, he had less than $3,500 into it. He did all his own work on it.
Posted by 86 mustang gt (Member # 10848) on
:
I guess there isn't really a winner lol I'm leaning more on the 351 just to stay all ford
Posted by Slowback67 (Member # 6348) on
:
Stock for stock. The LS1 is better. They come with a better set of heads from the factory. Would I buy one? Hell no LOL. You can build a very nice running 351w that will run for years without any problems.
Mail order LS1 350 hp ~ 5,000.00+
http://www.jegs.com/i/GM%20Performance/809/17801267/10002/-1?CT=999
Mail order 351/408cid 425hp ~ 4,500.00 +
http://www.jegs.com/i/Blueprint-Engines/138/BPF4084CT/10002/-1?parentProductId=
I'm surprised the 351w stroker motor is 500 bucks cheaper then an LS1...... And stock ( meaning how it's comming from jegs.) Makes a bit more HP for the money. Sorry I pulled a Chevy move and posted a bigger motor. But most people are building strokers now anyways LOL.
Posted by 86 mustang gt (Member # 10848) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by TACH2MX:
I feel ya bruh., i gets down. I've built some basic h/c/i s/c combos. They go for sure. My boy runs 10's on a junkyard build= 4cyl picknpull notch/ f150 5.8 shortblock,/ EdL alum. heads/ demon carb/ stock AOD. and a 150 shot. He ran it a few times at Sac raceway before it blew. Since he put a 408 bottom end/ same setup same car and now runs low 9's. Before the stroker kit, he had less than $3,500 into it. He did all his own work on it.
Seems like this swap might be half the cost of a ls1
Posted by svfreerider87 (Member # 5748) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by JUNKYARD5.0:
quote:
Originally posted by svfreerider87:
man so many ls1 haters, to all you with negative feedback, have any of you owned, driven, or built an ls engine?
Same question goes to the guys who have negative feedback about the 351, have you ever owned, driven, or built a 351?
ya i stated in my previous post, I had a 351 windsor stroked to 408, with 13:5:1 compression, afr heads, demon carb, etc, so ya I have a lil experience with fords/351, had a 347 stroker in my 89 with ported aluminum heads and an s trim.
[ May 30, 2012, 05:52 PM: Message edited by: svfreerider87 ]
Posted by 86 mustang gt (Member # 10848) on
:
[/qb][/QUOTE]ya i stated in my previous post, I had a 351 windsor, with 13:5:1 compression, afr heads, demon carb, etc, so ya I have a lil experience with fords/351, had a 347 stroker in my 89 with ported aluminum heads and an s trim. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Hey bro how much of a difference did u feel the 351 from the stroked out 302?
Posted by svfreerider87 (Member # 5748) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by 86 mustang gt:
ya i stated in my previous post, I had a 351 windsor, with 13:5:1 compression, afr heads, demon carb, etc, so ya I have a lil experience with fords/351, had a 347 stroker in my 89 with ported aluminum heads and an s trim. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Hey bro how much of a difference did u feel the 351 from the stroked out 302? [/QB][/QUOTE]
the 302 had crazy top end once the boost kicked in, but the 408 was just power any time you want it, revved better, it was balanced better, with way better parts.
Posted by svfreerider87 (Member # 5748) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by svfreerider87:
quote:
Originally posted by 86 mustang gt:
ya i stated in my previous post, I had a 351 windsor, with 13:5:1 compression, afr heads, demon carb, etc, so ya I have a lil experience with fords/351, had a 347 stroker in my 89 with ported aluminum heads and an s trim.
Hey bro how much of a difference did u feel the 351 from the stroked out 302? [/QB][/QUOTE]
the 302 had crazy top end once the boost kicked in, but the 408 was just power any time you want it, revved better, it was balanced better, with way better parts. [/QB][/QUOTE]
my 408 was more of a drag motor, most aren't built that agressive.you could build something more streetable like warhorse's motor.
Posted by Wrenchin (Member # 9529) on
:
Why are we arguing over two propelry built motors being better than each other. As far as im concerned, 351 and a 346 ls1 is still pushrod. They can both do the same shit.
Thats what makes the car game interesting, not everyone has the same shit, same build.
Posted by svfreerider87 (Member # 5748) on
:
better to argue over this than, some donut videos or shitty street drags lol.
Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com