This is topic AED Tomorrow in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=051738

---

Posted by MikeD. (Member # 8060) on :
 
Going in for a few pulls tomorrow! Hopefully im CLOSE to 300rw. Whats your guys' guesstimates?

GT40Ps
B303
1.7s
Exploder intake
1 3/4 LTs

Ill post graph and videos tomorrow evening!

I say 276/330
 

---

Posted by Stangn5oh (Member # 10875) on :
 
Im sorry bro im guessing 260 tops.
Please give more description, i thnk u left a couple things out do you have full exhaust or headers or sumthn more than just what you stated
 

---

Posted by Blind (Member # 3052) on :
 
I'd hope it's more than that, I made 249rwhp/290rwtq with stock heads/cam/rockers/intake/tb/everything from tb to oil pan stock as a baseline in my coupe.

Just short belt, longtubes, and 16* timing with 91.
 

---

Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :
 
It will be interesting to see what it lays down. What supporting mods do you have and are you getting tuned or just dyno?

I'd going to say high 270s SAE, mid 280s STD (If I recall AED shows STD numbers).

Remember, less steep gears and lighter wheels will shower higher power too.

Best of luck.
 

---

Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Blind:
I'd hope it's more than that, I made 249rwhp/290rwtq with stock heads/cam/rockers/intake/tb/everything from tb to oil pan stock as a baseline in my coupe.

Just short belt, longtubes, and 16* timing with 91.

---

Both of your cars put down more power for the mods than any I ever heard. 249rwhp with short belt, long tubes, and timing is not the norm... (then again I have no idea what correction factor your dyno operator was using)

[ January 04, 2012, 04:13 PM: Message edited by: Luke87GT ]
 

---

Posted by SnakeBit (Member # 8871) on :
 
Im going to say 270hp/285tq. Sorry but those previous numbers sound a little inflated for just having long tubes & timing. Good luck
 

---

Posted by Eddie510- (Member # 2354) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Blind:
I'd hope it's more than that, I made 249rwhp/290rwtq with stock heads/cam/rockers/intake/tb/everything from tb to oil pan stock as a baseline in my coupe.

Just short belt, longtubes, and 16* timing with 91.

---

Nice ... Thats exactly what i had in my lx but with crane rockers .. went around 235/ 300 tq ! car went 13.9 with bald tires ... added 100 nx .. went 12.6
 

---

Posted by Blind (Member # 3052) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Luke87GT:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Blind:
I'd hope it's more than that, I made 249rwhp/290rwtq with stock heads/cam/rockers/intake/tb/everything from tb to oil pan stock as a baseline in my coupe.

Just short belt, longtubes, and 16* timing with 91.

---

Both of your cars put down more power for the mods than any I ever heard. 249rwhp with short belt, long tubes, and timing is not the norm... (then again I have no idea what correction factor your dyno operator was using)

---

Mr lxcoupe Christian made 2rwhp more than my coupe with the same stuff Mine made ~5rwtq more though, but still pissed me off.

it ran 13.01 @ 104mph in this trim.

http://i40.photobucket.com/albums/e237/blindbatts/mustang/89dyno2.jpg

remember though, "shortbelt" on my car was just crank/waterpump/3g alt and a mark8 fan. I had a flaming river manual steering setup, a race crank pully, and underdrive on waterpump. The p/s pump is good for a few hp.

[ January 04, 2012, 04:59 PM: Message edited by: Blind ]
 

---

Posted by 98 ROUSH (Member # 10309) on :
 
272hp/297tq
 

---

Posted by stackss2 (Member # 10071) on :
 
Good luck. im going to aed on friday to get my car tuned
 

---

Posted by SS396 chevelle (Member # 7277) on :
 
johnb built the engine i guess 220 at the wheels
 

---

Posted by MikeD. (Member # 8060) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by SS396 chevelle:
johnb built the engine i guess 220 at the wheels

---

Why such a smart ass!


You know this won't break 210....

Well, I listed only the stuff that makes a real difference in power, but since you asked...

70mm tb
O/R H pipe w/ single chambers
Under drive pullys
E-fan
3.55s
Uhhhhh.... Some other stuff.

Well that's the important things I guess.
 

---

Posted by 50Reasons (Member # 6452) on :
 
isay 260 to 280
 

---

Posted by NEIGHT (Member # 8741) on :
 
304 rwhp 356 torque
 

---

Posted by Camara90 (Member # 134) on :
 
280/325.. are you tuning it on the dyno, or just making pulls?
 

---

Posted by MikeD. (Member # 8060) on :
 
Just good old timing a fp.
 

---

Posted by moeofit32 (Member # 10393) on :
 
i dont think your going to hit 300 with the setup but car should hit about 275
 

---

Posted by 1RaW03SvT (Member # 9151) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by MikeD.:
Going in for a few pulls tomorrow! Hopefully im CLOSE to 300rw. Whats your guys' guesstimates?

GT40Ps
B303
1.7s
Exploder intake
1 3/4 LTs

Ill post graph and videos tomorrow evening!

I say 276/330

---

GOOD LUCK



 

---

Posted by MikeD. (Member # 8060) on :
 
Well I guess well see what happens fellas!
 

---

Posted by 88FOX (Member # 9969) on :
 
Any port work to the heads and intake?
 

---

Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by MikeD.:

quote:

---

Originally posted by SS396 chevelle:
johnb built the engine i guess 220 at the wheels

---

Why such a smart ass!


You know this won't break 210....

Well, I listed only the stuff that makes a real difference in power, but since you asked...

70mm tb
O/R H pipe w/ single chambers
Under drive pullys
E-fan
3.55s
Uhhhhh.... Some other stuff.

Well that's the important things I guess.

---

Mike,

Off-road exhaust, a catback, underdrives, and e-fan could be worth as much as 15-20rwhp at high RPM. I'd say that's a real difference in power

Also, the 3.55s will show more power on the dyno than a 3.73 or a 4.10 so that's in your favor as well.

Make sure to note the correction factor so folks can compare apples to apples.

And Kevin, your "shortbelt and long tubes" was actually long-tubes, under-drive pullies with a race crank, manual steering rack and e-fan? Did you have a cat-back and Hpipe? What about a CAI or K&N?

Are you in sales and marketing by any chance?
 

---

Posted by 98z28 (Member # 8408) on :
 
Damn cam, intake, heads, an full bolt ons in my world I'd say 430-480rwhp depending on set up.

But in your world! Lol, 265rwhp!
 

---

Posted by Smoked50 (Member # 9592) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 98z28:
Damn cam, intake, heads, an full bolt ons in my world I'd say 430-480rwhp depending on set up.

But in your world! Lol, 265rwhp!

---

You're comparing 87-93 to 98-02
 

---

Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 98z28:
Damn cam, intake, heads, an full bolt ons in my world I'd say 430-480rwhp depending on set up.

But in your world! Lol, 265rwhp!

---

In your world cars are also heavy, unreliable, have cheap plastic interiors, and look like cat-fish
 

---

Posted by SlowStockFox (Member # 1081) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Luke87GT:

quote:

---

Originally posted by 98z28:
Damn cam, intake, heads, an full bolt ons in my world I'd say 430-480rwhp depending on set up.

But in your world! Lol, 265rwhp!

---

In your world cars are also heavy, unreliable, have cheap plastic interiors, and look like cat-fish

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Luke87GT:

quote:

---

Originally posted by 98z28:
Damn cam, intake, heads, an full bolt ons in my world I'd say 430-480rwhp depending on set up.

But in your world! Lol, 265rwhp!

---

In your world cars are also heavy, unreliable, have cheap plastic interiors, and look like cat-fish

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by SS396 chevelle:
johnb built the engine i guess 220 at the wheels

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Luke87GT:

quote:

---

Originally posted by MikeD.:

quote:

---

Originally posted by SS396 chevelle:
johnb built the engine i guess 220 at the wheels

---

Why such a smart ass!


You know this won't break 210....

Well, I listed only the stuff that makes a real difference in power, but since you asked...

70mm tb
O/R H pipe w/ single chambers
Under drive pullys
E-fan
3.55s
Uhhhhh.... Some other stuff.

Well that's the important things I guess.

---

Mike,

Off-road exhaust, a catback, underdrives, and e-fan could be worth as much as 15-20rwhp at high RPM. I'd say that's a real difference in power

Also, the 3.55s will show more power on the dyno than a 3.73 or a 4.10 so that's in your favor as well.

Make sure to note the correction factor so folks can compare apples to apples.

And Kevin, your "shortbelt and long tubes" was actually long-tubes, under-drive pullies with a race crank, manual steering rack and e-fan? Did you have a cat-back and Hpipe? What about a CAI or K&N?

Are you in sales and marketing by any chance?

---

I said it had longtubes which should imply full exhaust It had LT's, dr. gas X-pipe without cats, and a pair of flowmasters welded into stock flowtubes dumped.

Stock air box and inlet tubing with a drop-in K&N.

speed density too

[ January 05, 2012, 11:26 AM: Message edited by: Blind ]
 

---

Posted by WrenchMonkey (Member # 9529) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by Luke87GT:

quote:

---

Originally posted by 98z28:
Damn cam, intake, heads, an full bolt ons in my world I'd say 430-480rwhp depending on set up.

But in your world! Lol, 265rwhp!

---

In your world cars are also heavy, unreliable, have cheap plastic interiors, and look like cat-fish

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by WrenchMonkey:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Luke87GT:

quote:

---

Originally posted by 98z28:
[qb] Damn cam, intake, heads, an full bolt ons in my world I'd say 430-480rwhp depending on set up.

But in your world! Lol, 265rwhp!

---

In your world cars are also heavy, unreliable, have cheap plastic interiors, and look like cat-fish

---

nothing rattled on my catfish, everything rattles on my 02, 85 and 92 mustangs :]

Also the camaro interior was nicer than 79-04 easily

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Luke87GT:

quote:

---

Originally posted by 98z28:
Damn cam, intake, heads, an full bolt ons in my world I'd say 430-480rwhp depending on set up.

But in your world! Lol, 265rwhp!

---

In your world cars are also heavy, unreliable, have cheap plastic interiors, and look like cat-fish

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by WrenchMonkey:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Luke87GT:

quote:

---

Originally posted by 98z28:
Damn cam, intake, heads, an full bolt ons in my world I'd say 430-480rwhp depending on set up.

But in your world! Lol, 265rwhp!

---

In your world cars are also heavy, unreliable, have cheap plastic interiors, and look like cat-fish

---

nothing rattled on my catfish, everything rattles on my 02, 85 and 92 mustangs :]

Also the camaro interior was nicer than 79-04 easily

---

But you still sold your catfish and came back to the Mustang world. Hmmmm?

[ January 05, 2012, 12:48 PM: Message edited by: CagedBlueGT ]
 

---

Posted by MikeD. (Member # 8060) on :
 
Well fellas, unfortunately I was unable to get down there. Had some things I needed to get taken care of. I will be going down next Thursday.
 

---

Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by turbo50:

quote:

---

Originally posted by SS396 chevelle:
johnb built the engine i guess 220 at the wheels

---

And it'll make enough to beat lukes cobra and jae jaes coupe so who cares?

---

At 3600lbs race weight and my conservative "street" tune off the dyno, let's just say I would not put any money on it, lol.

Although after today Mike will have track and dyno numbers so my money has to be on him against JJ. As far as I know (or JJ knows), the primer coupe could have a missing spark plug wire making 195rwhp and nobody would ever know since it's never seen a track or a dyno

[ January 05, 2012, 02:32 PM: Message edited by: Luke87GT ]
 

---

Posted by SIC9250 (Member # 8216) on :
 
Still waiting bud
 

---

Posted by SIC9250 (Member # 8216) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by MikeD.:
Well fellas, unfortunately I was unable to get down there. Had some things I needed to get taken care of. I will be going down next Thursday.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by SIC9250:

quote:

---

Originally posted by MikeD.:
Well fellas, unfortunately my car laid down 189rwhp. I'm devastated and embarassed. I just ordered AFR heads, will have them installed by Wed, and back on the Dyno Thurs ready for Luke and JJ

---

Fail..

---

 

---

Posted by MikeD. (Member # 8060) on :
 
Bahahahaha fml...
 

---

Posted by CagedBlueGT (Member # 9804) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by MikeD.:
Bahahahaha fml...

---