This is topic Stock coupe runs 12s. cleanest i seen so far in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners  .


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=049988

---

Posted by CHICKEN_COUPE (Member # 5779) on :
 
by far this is one of the cleanest coupes i seen.

http://youtu.be/FYEcMBleRtY

http://www.mustang50magazine.com/featuredvehicles/m5lp_0507_1993_ford_mustang_notchback/index.html
 

---

Posted by SmallBlock Speeder (Member # 11220) on :
 
Stock my ass this fuckers got some work
 

---

Posted by CHICKEN_COUPE (Member # 5779) on :
 
It gotta have a built rear end and some secrets but damn this cars clean
 

---

Posted by NEIGHT (Member # 8741) on :
 
Sounds sticky as hell
 

---

Posted by 98z28 (Member # 8408) on :
 
Stock
 

---

Posted by MikeD. (Member # 8060) on :
 
I say stock HCI. Probably 4.10s, exhaust, race pulley, 1.7s, and full drag suspension. As well as some weight reduction.
 

---

Posted by turbo50 (Member # 6700) on :
 
2885 without driver........
 

---

Posted by 1RaW93SvT (Member # 9151) on :
 
Yay ya ya thats one of those super secret fucks that built that shit but wanted it to look stock as possible!!

They say it has mods but just lil stuff.. I call p
To the car being stock! But for cleam as fuck ohhhh ya thats shits real nicely taken care of!!
 

---

Posted by Stangn5oh (Member # 10875) on :
 
i believe its a stock 5.0, because they already tricked me.
What ppl have been doing is putting the new 5.0 motors in a
foxbody.
Running high elevens and average 12s.

So they are telling the truth about having a stock 5.0
 

---

Posted by Catfish (Member # 9529) on :
 
A new stock 5.0 motor is going to trap atleast 107+, not 103.
 

---

Posted by 89 306 (Member # 9042) on :
 
I beleve it!! He has good suspension gears exhuast slicks too lok how hard he is launching that thing..
 

---

Posted by Stangn5oh (Member # 10875) on :
 
Go to the drag section
open up the post that says 9/14 sac raceway,"sumthn like that"
At the bottom of page 1 he says im runnin a new 2011 motor

http://www.californiafords.com/ubb/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic;f=2;t=001950

[ October 07, 2011, 08:58 AM: Message edited by: Stangn5oh ]
 

---

Posted by slow2v (Member # 9403) on :
 
eh vahli
 

---

Posted by Blind (Member # 3052) on :
 
seems easy to believe, my `89 with the old stock motor setup trapped 101, 13.01 et.

slicks, gears, no p/s, no a/c, alum driveshaft, stage2 clutch, 40" belt, no front swaybar, spares up front, longtubes, o/r x-pipe, dumped catback...and drive it like I hated it.

the engine was "stock" from the throttle body to the oil pan, never opened untouched. The car was not stock, there's a big difference.

[ October 07, 2011, 09:58 AM: Message edited by: Blind ]
 

---

Posted by turbo50 (Member # 6700) on :
 
Easy to believe my stock from tb to oil pan car went 13.40s at 101.3 and it was an 89 hatch.
 

---

Posted by 50DADDY (Member # 3076) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by turbo50:
Easy to believe my stock from tb to oil pan car went 13.40s at 101.3 and it was an 89 hatch.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Stangn5oh:
i believe its a stock 5.0, because they already tricked me.
What ppl have been doing is putting the new 5.0 motors in a
foxbody.
Running high elevens and average 12s.

So they are telling the truth about having a stock 5.0

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by SwEeT 03 Gt:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Stangn5oh:
i believe its a stock 5.0, because they already tricked me.
What ppl have been doing is putting the new 5.0 motors in a
foxbody.
Running high elevens and average 12s.

So they are telling the truth about having a stock 5.0

---

frank look at the date on that video it was upload in 2008 the new 5.0 came out last year ahahaha

---

Gesh who looks at the dates? Hekka put me on blast
na jk bro i guess i didnt catch that lol
 

---

Posted by CHICKEN_COUPE (Member # 5779) on :
 
have any of you guys looked at the other link and seen the pics?
 

---

Posted by Stangn5oh (Member # 10875) on :
 
Not me forsure, ill get around to it tho
 

---

Posted by 92MaroonGT (Member # 10397) on :
 
Did any of you read the article? The engine itself is 'stock'. Not the car. With aftermarket suspension, tires, alum driveshaft, radiator, a/c delete, built rearend, p/s bypass, and underdrive pulleys, the engine is stock, not the car.
 

---

Posted by NavidR (Member # 3164) on :
 

quote:

---

Originally posted by 92MaroonGT:
Did any of you read the article? The engine itself is 'stock'. Not the car. With aftermarket suspension, tires, alum driveshaft, radiator, a/c delete, built rearend, p/s bypass, and underdrive pulleys, the engine is stock, not the car.

---