This is topic Get out and vote! in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners .
To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=044699
Posted by slidewayz94 (Member # 3101) on
:
It's going to be raining on you will probably be at home, so what better time to read your voter's guide and educate yourself. Now is that time if you haven't already.
If your unsure or undecided on a person or proposition Google is your friend!
SACRAMENTO COUNTY RESIDENTS: Please vote Sheriff's Captain Jim Cooper as your next Sheriff of Sacramento County.Jim Cooper for Sheriff
If you live in any of the incorporated cities of Sacramento County your vote counts!!
I will answer any questions you have via PM if your undecided on this specific matter.
Posted by Josef Mengele (Member # 10402) on
:
Posted by WildFire532FB (Member # 1482) on
:
Anyone know where i can find info on the judges? I wanna make sure they support guns before i vote yes or no on them.
Posted by Disturbing The Streets mcc (Member # 3303) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
Anyone know where i can find info on the judges? I wanna make sure they support guns before i vote yes or no on them.
good call! let me know!
Posted by 50Reasons (Member # 6452) on
:
Sorry steve but I will vote against Cooper he's a hot head never liked him at all!
Posted by 2TONE (Member # 4216) on
:
Get out and Vote NO on 19..this is 2tone and I approve this message
Posted by wilit (Member # 3367) on
:
I normally don't like to spew political endorsements on forums, but PLEASE don't let Kamala Harris (D) win Attorney General. Please vote for Steve Cooley (R). Here's some info on the guy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Cooley If Kameltoe Harris wins, we're all going to be F'd.
Posted by John91coupe (Member # 18) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
Anyone know where i can find info on the judges? I wanna make sure they support guns before i vote yes or no on them.
Best I can do for you.
http://www.judgevoterguide.com/
Posted by WildFire532FB (Member # 1482) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by wilit:
I normally don't like to spew political endorsements on forums, but PLEASE don't let Kamala Harris (D) win Attorney General. Please vote for Steve Cooley (R). Here's some info on the guy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Cooley If Kameltoe Harris wins, we're all going to be F'd.
Yeah if you want to keep your guns don't vote for Harris, he wants to take them away for sure. Vote Cooley!
quote:
Originally posted by John91coupe:
quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
Anyone know where i can find info on the judges? I wanna make sure they support guns before i vote yes or no on them.
Best I can do for you.
http://www.judgevoterguide.com/
Thanks John. Thats the only place i am stuck on in my voting. Don't care about judges as long as they are Pro-2A
Posted by svt306snake (Member # 1967) on
:
if you are in Sacramento vote no on measure B. im sure steve will thank you too
Posted by DLo (Member # 6133) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by wilit:
I normally don't like to spew political endorsements on forums, but PLEASE don't let Kamala Harris (D) win Attorney General. Please vote for Steve Cooley (R). Here's some info on the guy. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Cooley If Kameltoe Harris wins, we're all going to be F'd.
Kamala Harris and her fighting crime ad... right ![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
That is one person who is definitely not getting my vote.
Posted by Slowback67 (Member # 6348) on
:
Vote or die
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vrn0stZVHwM&feature=youtube_gdata_player
Posted by 1FAST89GT (Member # 5071) on
:
NO on 19 ![[burnout]](graemlins/burnout.gif)
Posted by CompSVT (Member # 7392) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by 1FAST89GT:
NO on 19
![[patriot]](graemlins/patriot.gif)
Posted by 85notch5.0 (Member # 9804) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by 2TONE:
Get out and Vote NO on 19..this is 2tone and I approve this message
Haha. Why no? I mean, Im an E.D.S and I voted no. But whats your reason?
Posted by bottled95GT?? (Member # 1772) on
:
I drove by a big ass Whitmen(sp?) campaign bus the other day. I couldn't help getting in front of it rolling down my window and throwing up the bird. Oh shit ya I said it.
Posted by Josef Mengele (Member # 10402) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by 85notch5.0:
quote:
Originally posted by 2TONE:
Get out and Vote NO on 19..this is 2tone and I approve this message
Haha. Why no? I mean, Im an E.D.S and I voted no. But whats your reason?
What is EDS? Is that like a lamer version of being LDS? Are you guys growers that want to keep the system the way it is? I dont really mind either way, because its practially decriminalized as it is now. You just have to find a reason why a doctor will prescribe it to you. Just the fact that this could possibly be legal in Ca is just mind blowing.
Posted by WildFire532FB (Member # 1482) on
:
I don't like Prop 19 because you can't fire someone who's high on the job unless you can prove it effects their ability to do the job. No one can drink on the job so no one should smoke either.
Posted by 90FoX (Member # 1974) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
I don't like Prop 19 because you can't fire someone who's high on the job unless you can prove it effects their ability to do the job. No one can drink on the job so no one should smoke either.
False ![[dance]](graemlins/dance.gif)
Posted by WildFire532FB (Member # 1482) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by 90FoX:
quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
I don't like Prop 19 because you can't fire someone who's high on the job unless you can prove it effects their ability to do the job. No one can drink on the job so no one should smoke either.
False
Thats how i read it, unless your saying false you drink on the job lol
Posted by 90FoX (Member # 1974) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
quote:
Originally posted by 90FoX:
quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
I don't like Prop 19 because you can't fire someone who's high on the job unless you can prove it effects their ability to do the job. No one can drink on the job so no one should smoke either.
False
Thats how i read it, unless your saying false you drink on the job lol
the law does not prevent employers from maintaining a drug free workplace
Posted by Josef Mengele (Member # 10402) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by 90FoX:
quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
quote:
Originally posted by 90FoX:
quote:
Originally posted by WildFire532FB:
I don't like Prop 19 because you can't fire someone who's high on the job unless you can prove it effects their ability to do the job. No one can drink on the job so no one should smoke either.
False
Thats how i read it, unless your saying false you drink on the job lol
the law does not prevent employers from maintaining a drug free workplace
That makes sense then, just because drinking is legal you cant go to work drunk. Unless you work for Chrysler. ![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
Posted by gtowned (Member # 8156) on
:
Prop 19 decriminalizes not legalizes I know to most people on here are probably thinking its the same thing but its not. If 19 passes there will be more laws regulating possesion,cultivation and use than there are now.And if youre between the ages 18-20 you really get fucked by 19.
Most people who want 19 to pass are these dumb little stoners who want to buy there dub sacks at the corner store.
Im all for complete legalization but the way Ca is going about it is all wrong and its being done for the wrong reasons.
Its more legal right now than it will ever be.
One last thing. I heard a "No" on prop 19 radio ad yesterday and it cracked me up because it said that if it passes everyone will be high at work. Thats funny because its not like if it passes people who dont smoke are going to start and the people who do already smoke on the job.
Posted by 90FoX (Member # 1974) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by gtowned:
Prop 19 decriminalizes not legalizes I know to most people on here are probably thinking its the same thing but its not. If 19 passes there will be more laws regulating possesion,cultivation and use than there are now.
Can you give me example of what your talking about? I don't believe this is true, but maybe you know something I don't. Any websites on this?
As far as I know laws will be more lax.
I pretty sure it will be treated more like alcohol.
Posted by slidewayz94 (Member # 3101) on
:
Just a couple more days. Looks like a lot of measures and candidates are still a very close race!
Posted by 2TONE (Member # 4216) on
:
Go GIANTS
Posted by 306Coupe (Member # 4988) on
:
"Alcohol ranks "most harmful" among a list of 20 drugs -- beating out crack and heroin -- according to study results released by a British medical journal.
A panel of experts weighed the physical, psychological and social problems caused by the drugs and determined that alcohol was the most harmful overall, according to an article on the study released by The Lancet Sunday.
Using a new scale to evaluate harms to individual users and others, alcohol received a score of 72 on a scale of 1 to 100, the study says.
That makes it almost three times as harmful as cocaine or tobacco, according to the article, which is slated to be published on The Lancet's website Monday and in an upcoming print edition of the journal.
Heroin, crack cocaine and methamphetamine were the most harmful drugs to individuals, the study says, while alcohol, heroin and crack cocaine were the most harmful to others.
In the article, the panelists said their findings show that Britain's three-tiered drug classification system, which places drugs into different categories that determine criminal penalties for possession and dealing, has "little relation to the evidence of harm."
Panelists also noted that the rankings confirm other studies that say that "aggressively targeting alcohol harms is a valid and necessary public health strategy."
The Lancet article was co-authored by David Nutt, a professor and Britain's former chief drug adviser, who caused controversy last year after he published an article saying ecstasy was not as dangerous as riding a horse.
"So why are harmful sporting activities allowed, whereas relatively less harmful drugs are not?" Nutt wrote in the Journal of Psychopharmacology. "I believe this reflects a societal approach which does not adequately balance the relative risks of drugs against their harms."
Nutt later apologized to anyone offended by the article and to those who have lost loved ones to ecstasy. He said he had no intention of trivializing the dangers of the drug and that he only wanted to compare the risks.
In the article released by The Lancet Sunday, ecstasy's harmfulness ranking -- 9 -- indicates it is only one eighth as harmful as alcohol.
The study was funded by the London-based Centre for Crime and Justice studies."
http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/11/01/alcohol.harm/index.html?hpt=C1
Posted by 04 S281 (Member # 9229) on
:
Vote NO on prop 23. AB 32 WON'T AFFECT PASSENGER VEHICLES!!!
If prop 23 passes and CARB is forced to suspend AB32, they will crack down on passenger vehicle emission standards to compensate!
Posted by slidewayz94 (Member # 3101) on
:
Voted @ 0700!
Posted by Slowback67 (Member # 6348) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by 04 S281:
Vote NO on prop 23. AB 32 WON'T AFFECT PASSENGER VEHICLES!!!
If prop 23 passes and CARB is forced to suspend AB32, they will crack down on passenger vehicle emission standards to compensate!
I voted yes.
Global warming is a joke & so is having to spend 100,000.00 on new refer units on all our trucks at work...... And had to smog them bitches too!!! ![[BS flag]](graemlins/bs_flag.gif)
Posted by sic70stang (Member # 4347) on
:
I vote yes on 23. No on 19.
Posted by fstryde3 (Member # 8436) on
:
quote:
Originally posted by slidewayz94:
Voted @ 0700!
I voted a little later then that lol
Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com