65-66 or 67-68 fastback? - Northern California Ford Owners

This is topic 65-66 or 67-68 fastback? in forum General Talk at Northern California Ford Owners .

To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://californiafords.com/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=1;t=028420

Posted by 166 Merlot (Member # 1549) on :

What do you prefer and why?

I have a feeling everyone is going to say 67/68 but I personally like the 65/66 years better in a fastback. They're just a little cleaner.

but definitely 67-68 drop

Posted by eljefe (Member # 1753) on :

67-68 one word: BULLITT!! [worship]

Posted by Motorhead6T5 (Member # 4969) on :

65 because I own one,because they look the best I don't care what anybody says. [Razz]

Posted by t top freak (Member # 6269) on :

65-66, and i will own one.

what year was that fastback with the 03 cobra transplant? the one where they put the interior and engine in there? when i saw that, i honestly took my pants off

Posted by sharkattack (Member # 645) on :

I've got a 65 fastback. Problem is I just don't ever have time to finish it up. Motor and trans are ready to go in.

Posted by iron281 (Member # 80) on :

65-66 fastback. I always thought the 1965-1966 fastbacks overall were the cleanest, and look good from any angle. No bloat anywhere.

Posted by Drift-GT (Member # 762) on :

65-66 for sure. They have the cleanest lines, they look good in any form (fully restored, restromod, or full blown race car), and there not a big oll’ boat that the 67 and up are. But I am a bit biased because my first Mustang was a 65 GT “K” code coupe [burnout]

. Boy do I miss that car.

But damn the prices for fastbacks are outrageous!!

- Dana

[ February 09, 2007, 10:19 AM: Message edited by: Drift-GT ]

Posted by BlueBeast88.306 (Member # 6360) on :

I love the 65-66, but there definatly is nothing wrong with 67-68. I would be more than happy to own and drive either style.

Posted by 66backinblack (Member # 5372) on :

+1 to that. i got a 66 coupe right now. the body and everything else just looks tighter and cleaner. no big block though without alot of work [Frown]

Posted by 1968_Fastback (Member # 1482) on :

67-68 Fastback. I like the rear lights, i like how the Fastback part slopes down more instead of coming to a complete stop at the trunk.

I've always liked the 67-68 Fastbacks because of this, not because i own one [Wink]

Posted by 166 Merlot (Member # 1549) on :

quote:
Originally posted by t top freak:
65-66, and i will own one.

what year was that fastback with the 03 cobra transplant? the one where they put the interior and engine in there? when i saw that, i honestly took my pants off

was it an ugly yellow one?

Posted by N8 (Member # 6048) on :

no one like 69 fastbacks [Frown]

Posted by silverLX (Member # 3207) on :

This is SN-65

I personaly like the 67-68's better but a fastback is a fastback [worship]

Posted by FORDNUT (Member # 2348) on :

65/66...Nice small car that didnt need a great big motor to be fast..

[ February 09, 2007, 08:45 PM: Message edited by: FORDNUT ]

Posted by t top freak (Member # 6269) on :

quote:
Originally posted by silverLX:

This is SN-65

I personaly like the 67-68's better but a fastback is a fastback

fuck yeah there it is. god this car is sick as hell [worship]

Posted by Eddie88EL-EX (Member # 2354) on :

do you have any pics still 166 Merlot
of your old school that you sold? [Frown]

man that thing was bad! just think about the money you spent on the leen,dumped that into the 65... but the leen is bad ass aswell. [worship]

Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :

67-68 fastback is my all time fav car. They scream TOUGH!

65-66 is a girls car imho [Wink]

Posted by 1968_Fastback (Member # 1482) on :

quote:
Originally posted by Luke87GT:
67-68 fastback is my all time fav car. They scream TOUGH!

65-66 is a girls car imho

haha, i agree the 67-68s look more Muscle looking [Razz]

Posted by its50 (Member # 4069) on :

quote:
Originally posted by Eddie88EL-EX:
do you have any pics still 166 Merlot
of your old school that you sold? man that thing was bad! just think about the money you spent on the leen,dumped that into the 65... but the leen is bad ass aswell.

yeah the 65 was way clean i should have cashed out 4 that one ...do it again with the monte but better [patriot]

Posted by DLo (Member # 6133) on :

I love the smaller fast back.. but then again, these tail lights are sick!

Posted by 1320MASTER (Member # 773) on :

I think this was the number one car at the Autorama this weekend and thats not saying much. [Frown]

twin turbo

[ February 12, 2007, 10:47 AM: Message edited by: 1320MASTER ]

Posted by Eddie510- (Member # 2354) on :

Why god why did they put air bags on that thing!!!!! [Frown]

Looks like shit that lowered....ewwwww [BS flag]

[ February 12, 2007, 12:44 AM: Message edited by: Eddie510- ]

Posted by 1968_Fastback (Member # 1482) on :

WOW thats pretty low. I wouldn't have done that to that car.

Posted by 1320MASTER (Member # 773) on :

I didn't see any air bags on this car at all.

Posted by Luke87GT (Member # 21) on :

just awful!

It belongs on the cover of Lowrider Magazine

Posted by modular (Member # 6599) on :

I like the looks of lowered cars but that thing is ugly. I dont like anything about it...

Posted by 1968_Fastback (Member # 1482) on :

The interior might look nice.... [Confused]

Fueled by Ford Mustang Owners
on CaliforniaFords.com